Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CitationAIR 1967 SC 1836
CourtSupreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
Date24 April 1967
Year1967
BenchK. Subba Rao CJI, M. Hidayatullah, R.S. Bachawat, J.M. Shelat, C.A. Vaidialingam JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 21
CategoryConstitutional Law

Key Principle Established

Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21. Refusal or impounding of passport without following due process violates Articles 14 and 21.

Brief Facts

The passport of a citizen was impounded without giving reasons. The question was whether the right to travel abroad is part of “personal liberty” under Article 21.

Ratio Decidendi

The Constitution Bench held that right to travel abroad is part of personal liberty under Article 21. The expression “personal liberty” includes the right of locomotion and the right to travel abroad. Refusal to issue a passport or impounding one already issued, without following due process, violates Articles 14 and 21.

Impact & Significance

This judgment was a precursor to the Passports Act, 1967 and later to the more expansive interpretation of Article 21 in Maneka Gandhi (1978). It established that personal liberty is not limited to freedom from physical restraint.

Tags & Related Topics

Constitutional Law Article 14 Article 21
← Previous Judgment Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India
Next Judgment → Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum

Related Judgments

1984

Neeraja Chaudhary v. State of M.P.

(1984) 3 SCC 243

Release of bonded labourers without rehabilitation is cruelty. The State must ensure identification, release AND rehabilitation of bonded labourers.

Read Analysis
1986

Sheela Barse v. Union of India

(1986) 3 SCC 632

Children cannot be kept in jails. Directions issued for establishment of juvenile courts, children's homes, and appointment of duty counsel…

Read Analysis
1993

Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa

AIR 1993 SC 1960

State is liable to pay compensation for custodial death as a public law remedy under Article 32/226, independent of any…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.