Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(1992) 4 SCC 118
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date4 September 1992
Year1992
BenchB.P. Jeevan Reddy, S.C. Agrawal JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16, Article 311
CategoryHaryana-Specific, Service & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

Temporary or ad hoc employees who have served for a long period cannot be terminated without following principles of natural justice. They are entitled to be heard before termination.

Brief Facts

Ad hoc and temporary employees of Haryana state who had been working for substantial periods were terminated without notice or hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that while ad hoc or temporary employees do not have the same protection as regular employees, those who have served for a substantial period are entitled to principles of natural justice before termination. The State cannot arbitrarily terminate employees who have been allowed to continue for years.

  • Ad hoc employees of long standing cannot be terminated arbitrarily
  • They are entitled to reasonable notice and opportunity of hearing
  • The State must follow a rational and non-discriminatory procedure for regularization or termination

Impact & Significance

This Haryana-specific judgment provided important protection to ad hoc employees and has been extensively cited in the P&H High Court in cases involving temporary employees of Haryana government.

Tags & Related Topics

Haryana-Specific Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16 Article 311
← Previous Judgment Rudra Kumar Sain v. Union of India
Next Judgment → T.R. Kapur v. State of Haryana

Related Judgments

2014

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487

Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.

Read Analysis
2010

Baldev Singh v. State of Haryana (Shamlat Deh)

2010 SCC OnLine P&H 8312

Shamlat deh (village common land) cannot be sold, transferred, or encroached upon. Panchayat has duty to protect common land for…

Read Analysis
2008

Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University

(2008) 9 SCC 284

University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.