रामे गौड़ा बनाम एम. वरदप्पा नायडू
| Citation | (2004) 1 SCC 769 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 24 October 2003 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Bench | R.C. Lahoti, Ashok Bhan JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Limitation Act 1963 Article 112, Government Grants Act |
| Category | Property & Land Law |
Key Principle Established
Government land cannot be adversely possessed. No person can claim ownership of government land by adverse possession. The Limitation Act bars the remedy, not the right.
A person claimed title to government land by adverse possession, having been in possession for over 30 years.
The Court held that government land cannot be acquired by adverse possession in the ordinary sense. Under Article 112 of the Limitation Act, the limitation period for government to recover possession is 30 years (not 12 years). However, even after 30 years, only the remedy is barred — the government’s title is never extinguished.
This judgment is the definitive authority on protection of government land from adverse possession claims, frequently cited in encroachment cases across Haryana and other states.
(1999) 2 SCC 4
Mutation in revenue records does not confer title. It is merely a fiscal record for revenue collection purposes. Title can…
Read Analysis(2020) 9 SCC 1
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…
Read Analysis2010 SCC OnLine P&H 8312
Shamlat deh (village common land) cannot be sold, transferred, or encroached upon. Panchayat has duty to protect common land for…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.