एम.वी. बिजलानी बनाम भारत संघ
| Citation | (2006) 5 SCC 88 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 6 March 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Bench | S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Article 14, Article 16 |
| Category | Service & Employment Law |
Key Principle Established
Next-below-rule — when a senior officer's seniority is restored, all consequential benefits including promotion must follow. Officers promoted in the interim do not lose their right.
When seniority of officers was reshuffled by court orders, the question arose about the promotional rights of those who were already promoted and those who would have been promoted had the correct seniority been applied from the beginning.
The Court applied the next-below-rule: when a senior officer gets their rightful seniority position restored, they are entitled to promotion from the date the person immediately below them in the corrected seniority was promoted. This ensures that no one loses substantive rights due to administrative errors in seniority fixation.
This principle is essential in all seniority-based promotion disputes. When courts correct seniority lists, the next-below-rule determines the effective date of promotion for the restored officer.
2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487
Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.
Read Analysis(2008) 9 SCC 284
University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.
Read Analysis(1993) 2 SCC 411
Recruitment bodies must follow fair and transparent selection processes. Any irregularity in the recruitment process vitiates the entire selection.
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.