Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(1982) 1 SCC 618
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date15 December 1981
Year1982
BenchO. Chinnappa Reddy, A. Varadarajan JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16, Article 39(d)
CategoryConstitutional Law, Service & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.

Brief Facts

A driver in the Delhi Police challenged pay disparity between drivers in different central government departments performing identical work.

Ratio Decidendi

Justice Chinnappa Reddy held that equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal enforceable through Articles 14 and 16. Where two sets of employees perform the same work under the same employer, they are entitled to the same pay scale.

Impact & Significance

The starting point for equal pay jurisprudence in India. Cited thousands of times by government employees seeking pay parity, including in Haryana service matters.

Tags & Related Topics

Constitutional Law Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16 Article 39(d)
← Previous Judgment State of Punjab v. Joginder Singh
Next Judgment → State of Haryana v. Jasmer Singh

Related Judgments

2018

Haryana HPSC Recruitment Controversy Cases

CWP No. 24190/2018 (P&H HC)

HPSC recruitment must be transparent and merit-based. Irregularities in selection process vitiate the entire recruitment. Courts can quash recruitment where…

Read Analysis
2007

Municipal Committee, Patiala v. Model Town Residents Association

(2007) 8 SCC 669

Municipal bodies have a statutory duty to provide basic civic services. Failure to provide water supply, sanitation, and roads is…

Read Analysis
2011

Kuldeep Singh v. State of Haryana

(2011) 5 SCC 258

Daily-wage workers in Haryana government who have completed 240 days of continuous service cannot be terminated without compliance with Section…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.