नगर पालिका, जींद बनाम जगत राम
| Citation | 2005 SCC OnLine P&H 1887 |
| Court | Punjab & Haryana High Court |
| Date | 2005 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Bench | V.K. Bali, Hemant Gupta JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Limitation Act Section 27, Haryana Municipal Act |
| Category | Haryana-Specific, Property & Land Law |
Key Principle Established
Municipal land cannot be adversely possessed. Public property vested in municipality or panchayat is not subject to adverse possession claims by private individuals.
Private individuals claimed ownership over municipal land in Jind through adverse possession, arguing they had been in continuous possession for over 12 years.
The Court held that public property vested in a municipality cannot be adversely possessed. Government and municipal land is held in trust for the public and no private person can claim ownership through mere long possession.
Directly relevant Jind/Haryana authority on protection of municipal land from encroachment and adverse possession claims. Applied to similar disputes across Haryana municipalities.
2017 SCC OnLine P&H 2894
Pension is a right, not a bounty. Government cannot arbitrarily withhold or reduce pension of a retired employee. Pension disputes…
Read AnalysisAIR 1966 SC 1387
Under Punjab custom, ancestral agricultural land devolves through agnatic succession. The Hindu Succession Act prevails over custom for Hindu women's…
Read Analysis2012 SCC OnLine P&H 4128
Women in Haryana have equal right to ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Daughters are coparceners by…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.