एस.एन. कक्कड़ बनाम नंद किशोर भैया
| Citation | (2002) 5 SCC 499 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 23 July 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Bench | Doraiswamy Raju, Shivaraj V. Patil JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Limitation Act 1963 Section 27, Article 65 |
| Category | Property & Land Law |
Key Principle Established
For adverse possession, the possession must be open, continuous, hostile, and to the knowledge of the true owner for 12 years. Mere occupation is not enough.
A claim of adverse possession was made over immovable property. The question was what constitutes sufficient proof of adverse possession.
The Court held that for adverse possession, the claimant must prove:
Definitive authority on the elements of adverse possession. Cited in every adverse possession claim across India.
2012 SCC OnLine P&H 4128
Women in Haryana have equal right to ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Daughters are coparceners by…
Read Analysis(2020) 9 SCC 1
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…
Read Analysis(1999) 2 SCC 4
Mutation in revenue records does not confer title. It is merely a fiscal record for revenue collection purposes. Title can…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.