Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation2013 SCC OnLine P&H 22134
CourtPunjab & Haryana High Court
Date2013
Year2013
BenchS.J. Vazifdar CJ, G.S. Sandhawalia J.
Acts/ArticlesHaryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975, Punjab Land Preservation Act 1900
CategoryHaryana-Specific, Property & Land Law

Key Principle Established

Change of Land Use (CLU) permission is mandatory before converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use in Haryana. Construction without CLU is illegal.

Brief Facts

Agricultural land was being used for commercial construction without obtaining Change of Land Use (CLU) permission from the competent authority.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that CLU permission is mandatory before any agricultural land is converted to non-agricultural use. Construction on agricultural land without CLU is illegal and liable to be demolished. The Director, Town and Country Planning has the authority to grant or refuse CLU.

Impact & Significance

Essential authority for real estate and land use disputes in Haryana. Affects all property development on agricultural land across the state.

Tags & Related Topics

Haryana-Specific Property & Land Law Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975 Punjab Land Preservation Act 1900
← Previous Judgment Devi Lal v. State of Haryana (Lal Dora)
Next Judgment → Lachhman Singh v. Hazara Singh (Punjab Custom)

Related Judgments

2017

Ram Kishan v. State of Haryana

2017 SCC OnLine P&H 2894

Pension is a right, not a bounty. Government cannot arbitrarily withhold or reduce pension of a retired employee. Pension disputes…

Read Analysis
1966

Lachhman Singh v. Hazara Singh (Punjab Custom)

AIR 1966 SC 1387

Under Punjab custom, ancestral agricultural land devolves through agnatic succession. The Hindu Succession Act prevails over custom for Hindu women's…

Read Analysis
2012

State of Haryana v. Rani Devi

2012 SCC OnLine P&H 4128

Women in Haryana have equal right to ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Daughters are coparceners by…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.