Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CitationAIR 1966 SC 1387
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date10 March 1966
Year1966
BenchK. Subba Rao CJI, M. Hidayatullah, R.S. Bachawat JJ.
Acts/ArticlesHindu Succession Act 1956, Punjab Land Revenue Act, Punjab Custom
CategoryHaryana-Specific, Property & Land Law

Key Principle Established

Under Punjab custom, ancestral agricultural land devolves through agnatic succession. The Hindu Succession Act prevails over custom for Hindu women's inheritance rights.

Brief Facts

A dispute over agricultural land succession in Punjab/Haryana involving the conflict between customary law (riwaj-e-aam) and the Hindu Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that where the Hindu Succession Act applies, it overrides customary law. Daughters and widows have full rights of inheritance in both ancestral and self-acquired property. The old Punjab custom of excluding females from inheritance stands superseded.

Impact & Significance

Foundational for women’s land inheritance rights in Haryana/Punjab. Has been strengthened by the 2005 Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act giving daughters equal coparcenary rights.

Tags & Related Topics

Haryana-Specific Property & Land Law Hindu Succession Act 1956 Punjab Land Revenue Act Punjab Custom
← Previous Judgment Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Haryana (Change of Land Use)
Next Judgment → Prakash v. Phulavati

Related Judgments

2017

Ram Kishan v. State of Haryana

2017 SCC OnLine P&H 2894

Pension is a right, not a bounty. Government cannot arbitrarily withhold or reduce pension of a retired employee. Pension disputes…

Read Analysis
2013

Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Haryana (Change of Land Use)

2013 SCC OnLine P&H 22134

Change of Land Use (CLU) permission is mandatory before converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use in Haryana. Construction without CLU…

Read Analysis
2012

State of Haryana v. Rani Devi

2012 SCC OnLine P&H 4128

Women in Haryana have equal right to ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Daughters are coparceners by…

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.