Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
← International Law & Human Rights

Convention Against Torture (CAT), 1984

Full Name: Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Adopted: 10 December 1984 (entered into force 26 June 1987)
Type: Binding Treaty
Articles: 33
Monitoring Body: Committee Against Torture
India’s Status: Signed 14 October 1997 — NOT RATIFIED ✗

Overview

The CAT establishes an absolute prohibition on torture — no exceptional circumstances whatsoever, including war, political instability, or public emergency, may be invoked to justify torture. It requires states to criminalize torture, prevent it, and provide remedies to victims.

India’s Non-Ratification

India signed the CAT in 1997 but has not ratified it — making it one of the significant holdouts among large democracies. The Prevention of Torture Bill was introduced in Parliament but lapsed. India does not have a standalone anti-torture law, though torture is addressed through IPC provisions and judicial interpretation of Article 21.

Despite Non-Ratification: Judicial Application

  • D.K. Basu v. State of WB (1997): The 11 mandatory guidelines for arrest and detention were influenced by CAT norms
  • Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa (1993): Custodial death compensation — Court invoked international norms against torture
  • Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978): Prison torture prohibited under Article 21, drawing on international standards
  • Kishore Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1981): Solitary confinement and iron fetters held inhuman

Significance

India’s non-ratification of CAT remains a significant gap. However, through expansive interpretation of Article 21, Indian courts have effectively incorporated many CAT principles into domestic law — making the judicial framework stronger than the legislative one.

← Back to International Law Hub Browse Landmark Judgments →

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.