Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(1998) 6 SCC 720
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date20 August 1998
Year1998
BenchS. Saghir Ahmad, K. Venkataswami JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16
CategoryService & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

A person appointed to a particular cadre/post cannot be unilaterally transferred to a different cadre. The conditions of service at the time of appointment are binding on both employer and employee.

Brief Facts

Employees recruited for a specific cadre were transferred to a different cadre without their consent, altering their service conditions and promotion prospects.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that an employee recruited against a specific post/cadre cannot be unilaterally shifted to a different cadre. The terms of the recruitment advertisement and the appointment order form the foundation of the service relationship. Any change in cadre requires either the employee’s consent or a valid statutory rule.

Impact & Significance

This judgment protects employees from arbitrary cadre changes and is relied upon in cases where municipal or government employees are wrongly placed in different seniority lists.

Tags & Related Topics

Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16
← Previous Judgment State of Haryana v. Gurnam Singh
Next Judgment → M.A. Rasheed v. State of Kerala

Related Judgments

2014

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487

Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.

Read Analysis
2008

Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University

(2008) 9 SCC 284

University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.

Read Analysis
1993

National Federation of Blind v. UPSC

(1993) 2 SCC 411

Recruitment bodies must follow fair and transparent selection processes. Any irregularity in the recruitment process vitiates the entire selection.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.