हेमाजी वाघजी जाट बनाम भीखाभाई खेंगरभाई हरिजन
| Citation | (2009) 16 SCC 517 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 28 July 2009 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Bench | V.S. Sirpurkar, Mukundakam Sharma JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Limitation Act 1963 Section 27 |
| Category | Property & Land Law |
Key Principle Established
Adverse possession is a concept which rewards the trespasser and punishes the rightful owner. Courts should strictly scrutinize claims of adverse possession.
The case examined the doctrine of adverse possession and whether the courts should liberally or strictly interpret claims of adverse possession.
The Court observed that adverse possession rewards a trespasser and punishes the rightful owner who was too slow to enforce rights. The Court recommended that Parliament reconsider the law of adverse possession and that courts should strictly scrutinize such claims.
Signaled a judicial shift toward strict interpretation of adverse possession claims. Important for land dispute cases in Haryana where adverse possession is frequently pleaded.
2012 SCC OnLine P&H 4128
Women in Haryana have equal right to ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Daughters are coparceners by…
Read Analysis(2020) 9 SCC 1
Daughters have equal coparcenary rights by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — irrespective of whether the father…
Read Analysis(1999) 2 SCC 4
Mutation in revenue records does not confer title. It is merely a fiscal record for revenue collection purposes. Title can…
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.