Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(2001) 2 SCC 538
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date6 February 2001
Year2001
BenchM.B. Shah, D.P. Mohapatra JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16, Article 39(d), Article 43
CategoryService & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

Daily wage workers performing same duties as regular employees for years are entitled to equal wages. State cannot exploit labour by keeping workers on daily wages indefinitely.

Brief Facts

Daily wage workers employed by the State for years performing regular duties challenged disparity between their wages and regular employee pay.

Ratio Decidendi

Daily wage workers performing duties identical to regular employees are entitled to equal wages. The State cannot perpetuate an exploitative system where workers are kept on daily wages indefinitely while doing regular work.

Impact & Significance

Strengthened rights of daily wage and contractual workers in government employment. Frequently cited in Haryana contractual employee cases.

Tags & Related Topics

Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16 Article 39(d) Article 43
← Previous Judgment M.V. Bijlani v. Union of India
Next Judgment → Pawan Pratap Singh v. Reevan Singh

Related Judgments

2014

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487

Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.

Read Analysis
1993

National Federation of Blind v. UPSC

(1993) 2 SCC 411

Recruitment bodies must follow fair and transparent selection processes. Any irregularity in the recruitment process vitiates the entire selection.

Read Analysis
2008

Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University

(2008) 9 SCC 284

University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.