Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(1986) 2 SCC 157
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date25 November 1985
Year1986
BenchD.P. Madon, G.L. Oza JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16
CategoryService & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

An employee on deputation retains a lien on the parent cadre post. Period of deputation counts for seniority and promotion in the parent cadre unless rules provide otherwise.

Brief Facts

An officer on deputation found that his seniority in the parent cadre was adversely affected during the deputation period. He challenged this as arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that an employee on deputation retains a lien on the parent cadre post and the deputation period must be counted for seniority and promotion in the parent cadre, unless recruitment rules explicitly exclude deputation service. Deputation is undertaken in the interest of public service and should not penalize the officer.

Impact & Significance

This judgment protects deputationists’ rights in the parent cadre and is widely cited in disputes involving Haryana government officers on deputation to central government or autonomous bodies.

Tags & Related Topics

Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16
← Previous Judgment Rattan Lal v. State of Haryana
Next Judgment → Suraj Lamp & Industries v. State of Haryana

Related Judgments

2014

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487

Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.

Read Analysis
2008

Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University

(2008) 9 SCC 284

University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.

Read Analysis
1993

National Federation of Blind v. UPSC

(1993) 2 SCC 411

Recruitment bodies must follow fair and transparent selection processes. Any irregularity in the recruitment process vitiates the entire selection.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.