रत्तन लाल बनाम हरियाणा राज्य
| Citation | (1985) 4 SCC 43 |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Date | 18 September 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Bench | O. Chinnappa Reddy, V. Khalid JJ. |
| Acts/Articles | Article 14, Article 311 |
| Category | Haryana-Specific, Service & Employment Law |
Key Principle Established
When dismissal is set aside by court, the employee is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service. The burden is on the employer to prove that back wages should not be paid.
A Haryana government employee whose dismissal was set aside by the court sought reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service. The State argued for limited back wages.
The Court held that when dismissal is set aside as illegal, the natural consequence is reinstatement with full back wages unless the employer can demonstrate valid reasons for denying full wages. The employee is deemed to have been in continuous service, and all consequential benefits including seniority and promotion eligibility must be restored.
This Haryana-origin judgment establishes the default rule on back wages after wrongful termination — full back wages are the norm, and the employer bears the burden to justify any reduction.
2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487
Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.
Read Analysis2010 SCC OnLine P&H 8312
Shamlat deh (village common land) cannot be sold, transferred, or encroached upon. Panchayat has duty to protect common land for…
Read Analysis(2008) 9 SCC 284
University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.
Read AnalysisThis judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).
22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.