Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CitationAIR 1967 SC 1836
CourtSupreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
Date24 April 1967
Year1967
BenchK. Subba Rao CJI, M. Hidayatullah, R.S. Bachawat, J.M. Shelat, C.A. Vaidialingam JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 21
CategoryConstitutional Law

Key Principle Established

Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21. Refusal or impounding of passport without following due process violates Articles 14 and 21.

Brief Facts

The passport of a citizen was impounded without giving reasons. The question was whether the right to travel abroad is part of “personal liberty” under Article 21.

Ratio Decidendi

The Constitution Bench held that right to travel abroad is part of personal liberty under Article 21. The expression “personal liberty” includes the right of locomotion and the right to travel abroad. Refusal to issue a passport or impounding one already issued, without following due process, violates Articles 14 and 21.

Impact & Significance

This judgment was a precursor to the Passports Act, 1967 and later to the more expansive interpretation of Article 21 in Maneka Gandhi (1978). It established that personal liberty is not limited to freedom from physical restraint.

Tags & Related Topics

Constitutional Law Article 14 Article 21
← Previous Judgment Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India
Next Judgment → Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum

Related Judgments

1983

D.S. Nakara v. Union of India

AIR 1983 SC 130, (1983) 1 SCC 305

Pension is a right, not a bounty or gratuitous payment. Classification of pensioners into pre- and post-cutoff date categories for…

Read Analysis
2007

Municipal Committee, Patiala v. Model Town Residents Association

(2007) 8 SCC 669

Municipal bodies have a statutory duty to provide basic civic services. Failure to provide water supply, sanitation, and roads is…

Read Analysis
1982

Randhir Singh v. Union of India

(1982) 1 SCC 618

Equal pay for equal work is a constitutional goal derivable from Articles 14, 16, and 39(d) read together.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.