Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Citation(2009) 16 SCC 269
CourtSupreme Court of India
Date27 November 2009
Year2009
BenchS.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar JJ.
Acts/ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16, Haryana Service Rules
CategoryHaryana-Specific, Service & Employment Law

Key Principle Established

Promotion to a higher post must be based on the relevant recruitment and promotion rules. The State cannot bypass the rules by making ad hoc promotions indefinitely.

Brief Facts

Government employees in Haryana challenged the promotion policy where ad hoc promotions were being made indefinitely without following the regular promotion rules, affecting the seniority and rights of eligible employees.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that promotions must be made strictly in accordance with the recruitment and promotion rules. The State cannot circumvent the rules by making indefinite ad hoc promotions. Regular promotions through proper DPC must be conducted periodically.

Impact & Significance

This Haryana-specific judgment reinforced the rule of law in the promotion process and directed the State to regularize ad hoc promotions through proper procedures.

Tags & Related Topics

Haryana-Specific Service & Employment Law Article 14 Article 16 Haryana Service Rules
← Previous Judgment Managing Director, ECIL v. B. Karunakar
Next Judgment → B.V. Sivaiah v. K. Addanki Babu

Related Judgments

2014

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

2014 SCC OnLine P&H 22487

Government policy on regularization of contractual employees under HKRNL must be implemented uniformly. Selective application violates Article 14.

Read Analysis
2010

Baldev Singh v. State of Haryana (Shamlat Deh)

2010 SCC OnLine P&H 8312

Shamlat deh (village common land) cannot be sold, transferred, or encroached upon. Panchayat has duty to protect common land for…

Read Analysis
2008

Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal University

(2008) 9 SCC 284

University recruitment must follow UGC norms and guidelines. Appointments made in violation of minimum qualification requirements are void ab initio.

Read Analysis

Disclaimer

This judgment summary is for educational and research purposes. While care has been taken to accurately represent the ratio and findings, for authoritative reference always consult the original judgment text from official sources (SCC Online, AIR, Manupatra, or court websites).

Need Case Law Research or Legal Representation?

22+ years of practice before Punjab & Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India.

Call: +919915442266 WhatsApp

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact Advocate Ravinder Singh Dhull for expert legal guidance on your matter.